www.ahrq.gov/
Text Size:  Select for smaller font Select for medium font Select for larger font  Print this page

CUSP Toolkit

Understand the Science of Safety

Contents

Slide 1: Cover Slide

The “Understand the Science of Safety” module of the CUSP Toolkit. The CUSP toolkit is a modular approach to patient safety, and modules presented in this toolkit are interconnected and are aimed at improving patient safety.

Image: CUSP Toolkit logo.

Return to Contents

Slide 2: Learning Objectives

Text description is below image

In this module, we will:

  1. Describe the historical and contemporary context of the Science of Safety
  2. Explain how system design affects system results
  3. List the principles of safe design and identify how they apply to technical work and teamwork
  4. Detail how teams make wise decisions when there is diverse and independent input

Return to Contents

Slide 3: Putting Safety in Context

Team members examining a patient’s X-ray.

Advances in medicine have led to positive outcomes:

  • Most childhood cancers are curable
  • AIDS is now a chronic disease
  • Life expectancy has increased 10 years since the 1950s

However, sponges are still found inside patients’ bodies after operations.

Return to Contents

Slide 4: Health Care Defects

Text description is below image

In the U.S. health care system:

  • 7 percent of patients suffer a medication error.2
  • On average, every patient admitted to an intensive care unit suffers an adverse event.3, 4
  • 44,000 to 99,000 people die in hospitals each year as the result of medical errors.5
  • Over half a million patients develop catheter-associated urinary tract infections resulting in 13,000 deaths a year.6
  • Nearly 100,000 deaths from health care-associated infections (HAIs) each year and the cost of HAIs is $28 to $33 billion per year.7
  • Estimated 30,000 to 62,000 deaths from central line-associated blood stream infections per year.8

Return to Contents

Slide 5: How Can These Errors Happen?

A sign indicating a wet floor is removed while the floor is still wet. As a result, a patient slips on the floor.
  • People are fallible.
  • Medicine is still treated as an art, not a science.
  • Systems do not catch mistakes before they reach the patient.

Return to Contents

Slide 6: The Science of Safety

A group of team members conferring.
  • Every system is perfectly designed to achieve its end results.
  • Safe design principles must be applied to technical work and teamwork.
  • Teams make wise decisions when there is diverse and independent input.

Return to Contents

Slide 7: System-Level Factors Affect Safety9

Text description is below image

Concentric circles show the layered system-level factors that affect patient safety: institutional factors, hospital factors, departmental factors, work environment factors, team factors, individual provider factors, and task factors all have an effect on patient safety.

Return to Contents

Slide 8: Safety is a Property of the System

Video icon

(vignette still)
Click to play 

Return to Contents

Slide 9: System-Level Factors Can Predict Performance

Outcomes gained from small system factors can result in a monumental impact on safety performance. Having an intensivist on daily ICU rounds with a multidisciplinary team can reduce patient mortality. Having a nurse responsible for more than two patients in the ICU can increase

Examples of the Impact of System-Level Factors

System Factor Effect
Daily rounds with an intensivist When ICUs are staffed with a multidisciplinary team, including daily rounds with an intensivist, mortality is reduced
Nurses responsible for more than two patients When nurses are responsible for more than two patients, there is an increased risk of pulmonary complications in the ICU patient population
Point-of-care pharmacist or pharmacist who participates in rounds A point-of-care pharmacist or one who participates in rounds reduces prescribing errors

Return to Contents

Slide 10: Three Principles of Safe Design

Text description is below image

Three principles of safe design are standardize, create independent checks, and learn from defects.

Return to Contents

Slide 11: Standardize When You Can

Video icon

(vignette still)
Click to play 

Return to Contents

Slide 12: Create Independent Checks

Video icon

(vignette still)
Click to play 

Return to Contents

Slide 13: Learn From Defects

Video icon

(vignette still)
Click to play 

Return to Contents

Slide 14: Exercise

Exercise icon

Think about a recent safety issue in your unit and answer the four Learning from Defects questions:

  • What happened?
  • Why did it happen?
  • How will you reduce the risk of recurrence?
  • How will you know it worked?

Return to Contents

Slide 15: Principles of Safe Design Apply to Technical Work and Teamwork

Team members next to a line cart.

Return to Contents

Slide 16: Technical Work and Teamwork

Video icon; Principles of Safe Design Apply to Technical and Teamwork

(vignette still)
Click to play 

Return to Contents

Slide 17: Exercise

Exercise icon

How do you see technical and adaptive work fitting in your unit?

Return to Contents

Slide 18: Teams Make Wise Decisions When There is Diverse and Independent Input

A health care team

Return to Contents

Slide 19: Exercise

Text description is below image

Appreciate the wisdom of crowds

  • Emphasize that health care is a team effort
  • Develop an environment where frontline providers can voice concerns, and are acknowledged when they express concerns
  • Gather as many viewpoints as possible
Alternate between convergent and divergent thinking
  • Divergent thinking occurs on rounds, during brainstorming sessions, and when trying to understand what might be occurring10
  • Convergent thinking occurs while formulating a treatment plan or focusing on a specific task10

Return to Contents

Slide 20: Basic Components and Process of Communication11

Graphic description of the basic components and process of communication. The communication that takes place between two people is exposed to many roadblocks in between its transmission from one individual to another. First, the sender encodes, or creates, the message, which is influenced by the sender’s context, and then transmits the message to the receiver, who then must decode, or process, the message, based on the receiver’s context. While the message is being transmitted, it is exposed to noise interference that affects the context and clarity of the message that is sent and received.

Provider A – Sender and Receiver

  • Noise
  • A’s Context
  • Encoding and Decoding

Messages

  • Channel

Provider B – Sender and Receiver

  • Noise
  • B’s Context
  • Encoding and Decoding

Return to Contents

Slide 21: Diverse and Independent Input

Video icon

(vignette still)
Click to play 

Return to Contents

Slide 22: Reduced CRBSI By Applying Principles of Safe Design12

Over various time periods, the Median Catheter Related Blood Stream Infection (CRBSI) rate reduces in conjunction with the Incidence Rate Ratio:
Baseline infection rate of 2.7 with an incidence rate ratio of 1. Pre-Intervention infection rate of 1.6 with an incidence rate ratio of 0.76. 0-3 months: infection rate of 0 with an incidence rate ratio of 0.62. 4-6 months: infection rate of 0 with an incidence rate ratio of 0.56.
Time Period Median Catheter-Related Blood
Stream Infection (CRBSI) Rate
Incidence Rate Ratio
Baseline 2.7 1
Pre-intervention 1.6 0.76
0-3 months 0 0.62
4-6 months 0 0.56
7-9 months 0 0.47
10-12 months 0 0.42
13-15 months 0 0.37
16-18 months 0 0.34

Return to Contents

Slide 23: Understand the Science of Safety: What the Team Must Do

A team conferring at a table.
  • Develop a plan so all staff on your unit view the Understand the Science of Safety video.
  • Video screening should be mandatory for all unit staff.
  • Create a list of who has watched the video.
  • Describe the three principles of safe design:
    1. Standardize.
    2. Create independent checks.
    3. Learn from defects.

Return to Contents

Slide 24: Summary

Text description is below image.
  • Every system is designed to achieve its anticipated results.
  • The principles of safe design are standardize when you can, create independent checks, and learn from defects.
  • The principles of safe design apply to technical work and teamwork.
  • Teams make wise decisions when there is diverse input.

Return to Contents

Slide 25: CUSP Tools

Text description is below image.
  • Daily Goals Checklist
  • Morning Briefing
  • Shadowing Another Professional Tool
  • Observing Patient Care Rounds
  • Team Check-Up Tool

Return to Contents

Slide 26: TeamSTEPPS Tools1

Text description is below image.
  • Brief
  • Huddle
  • Debrief
  • SBAR
  • Check Back
  • Call Out
  • Hand Off
  • I PASS the BATON
  • DESC Script

*Please refer to the “Implement Teamwork and Communication” module for additional information*

Return to Contents

Slide 27: References

Text description is below image.

1.Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Department of Defense. TeamSTEPPS. Available at www.ahrq.gov/teamsteppstools/instructor/index.html
2. Bates DW, Cullen DJ, Laird N, et al. Incidence of adverse drug events and potential adverse drug events. JAMA. 1995;274(1):29-34.
3. Donchin Y, Gopher D, Olin M, et al. A look into the nature and causes of human errors in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med. 1995;23:294-300.
4. Andrews LB, Stocking C, Krizek T, et al. An alternative strategy for studying adverse events in medical care. Lancet. 349:309-313,1997.

Return to Contents

Slide 28: References

Text description is below image.

5. Kohn L, Corrigan J, Donaldson M. To err is human: building a safer health system. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1999.
6. Scott, RD. The Direct Medical Costs of Healthcare-Associated Infections in U.S. Hospitals and the Benefits of Prevention. March 2009. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/dhqp/pdf/Scott_CostPaper.pdf (Plugin Software Help)
7. Klevens M, Edwards J, Richards C, et al. Estimating Health Care-Associated Infections and Deaths in U.S. Hospitals, 2002. PHR. 2007;122:160-166.
8. Ending health care-associated infections, AHRQ, Rockville, MD, 2009. http://www.ahrq.gov/qual/haicusp.htm.
9. Vincent C, Taylor-Adams S, Stanhope N. Framework for analysing risk and safety in clinical medicine. BMJ. 1998;316:1154–57.

Return to Contents

Slide 29: References

Text description is below image.

10. Heifetz R. Leadership without easy answers, president and fellows of Harvard College. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press;1994.
11. Dayton E, Henriksen K. Communication failure: basic components, contributing factors, and the call for structure. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2007;33(1): 34-47.
12. Pronovost P, Needham D, Berenholtz S, et al. An intervention to decrease catheter-related bloodstream infections in the ICU. New Engl J Med. 2006;355(26):2725-32.

Return to Contents
Return to Index

Current as of August 2012


Internet Citation:

Understand the Science of Safety. Text Version of Slide Presentation. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD. http://www.ahrq.gov/cusptoolkit/4scisafety/scisafetyslides.htm


 

AHRQAdvancing Excellence in Health Care